Hello,
Is it possible to make Citrix Client as pisi package?

http://download.citrix.com.edgesuite.net/akdlm/7010/linuxx86_12.1.0.203066.tar.gz?__gda__=1340026109_822c5e9dfab97a97c973a660e4a96b61&__dlmgda__=1340112210_f860a75d394d3a37f059271957ba79e1&fileExt=.gz

Also some bug hints.

http://forums.citrix.com/thread.jspa?threadID=306353&tstart=0

Thanks in advance.

It is working

Many thanks.

Here is the offical Pardus packagers before.

http://paketler.pardus.org.tr/info/playground/packagers.html

Hi all,

If we give Turkish name as "KIZILYILDIZ"  does it make problem?

It means red star. I suggest as KIZILYILDIZ what do you say? there is no linux distribution in Turkey.

I am sure it is not intentionally.

May be some stupid mistake.

Richard,

Yes this block is true. From the hotel when I try to connect I could not.

Also from one of the company. But from my home and work I am able to connect.

Hello,

Is it possible to have QuteCom as pisi package?

Site is: http://trac.qutecom.org/downloads/qutecom-2.2.1.tar.gz

BR
Murat

Hi Richard,

This is not related to the actual topic but I want to ask one question? Is there any software that we can use Skype network without  skype client?

I really fed up with this 32 bit libraries.

Also is it possible to have Qutecom in repo?

Richard,

We need to force the groups to keep the basic structure and logic of Pardus.

For me KDE should be the base. Ok there can be other desktops but on other DVDs. I do not want mixture of software in one DVD with too many bugs containing it.

They have to drop the dependencies of desktops. I mean while I am installing one package coming with gnome, It should only install that package not the software coming with gnome or else.

We have to keep the original logic. Otherwise it will loose its beauty.

I do not know whether I could explain or not.

Hello,

What makes Pardus so special? For me, not the Turkish Language Support. Since I am working for international GSM Company I need to use English.

In this case why I am not using Debian or Ubuntu or Fedora etc.

I am using Pardus, since it is easy to install. GUI is good. Configuration tools are almost perfect.

I use Pardus because of Comar, Yalı, Pisi, Kaptan. I use Pardus because of its good integration with other programs.

The community distribution of Pardus should take care the base architecture of Pardus. Some people say there are not too much packages in Pardus repositories and can we integrate the other distributions repositories like Debian or Fedora.

It is quite normal to have less packages since Debian was evolving more than 14 years. Also how many of packages are we using really? I can say Pardus should continue with its own packages considering stability and perfection. With community there will be lots of people giving support to Pardus. And with one repository we can get rid of  double efforts.

Also the home page of Pardus as Richard said www.pardus.org.tr or www.pardus.org. It can be worldforum.pardus-linux.nl also. But as I said it should be central and everybody should know where to go instead of visiting www.pardus-linux.org or www.ozgurlukicin.org or www.pardus.org.tr or www.pardususer.de etc.

As a result,

1)There should be one repository
2)www.pardus.org to follow as home page but if not possible something else. But there should be one official site to follow.
3)We need to follow only pisi packages to provide stability and ease of use.
4)Pardus should keep its base architecture like, Comar,Pisi,Kaptan,Yalı and good integration with other programs.

Best Regards,

Murat

Hello,

When I try to reach http://www.pardus.org/

It is not possible. I think this domain does not have owner.

Murat

Hello,

What makes Pardus so special? For me, not the Turkish Language Support. Since I am working for international GSM Company I need to use English.

In this case why I am not using Debian or Ubuntu or Fedora etc.

I am using Pardus, since it is easy to install. GUI is good. Configuration tools are almost perfect.

I use Pardus because of Comar, Yalı, Pisi, Kaptan. I use Pardus because of its good integration with other programs.

The community distribution of Pardus should take care the base architecture of Pardus. Some people say there are not too much packages in Pardus repositories and can we integrate the other distributions repositories like Debian or Fedora.

It is quite normal to have less packages since Debian was evolving more than 14 years. Also how many of packages are we using really? I can say Pardus should continue with its own packages considering stability and perfection. With community there will be lots of people giving support to Pardus. And with one repository we can get rid of  double efforts.

Also the home page of Pardus as Richard said www.pardus.org.tr or www.pardus.org. It can be worldforum.pardus-linux.nl also. But as I said it should be central and everybody should know where to go instead of visiting www.pardus-linux.org or www.ozgurlukicin.org or www.pardus.org.tr or www.pardususer.de etc.

As a result,

1)There should be one repository
2)www.pardus.org to follow as home page but if not possible something else. But there should be one official site to follow.
3)We need to follow only pisi packages to provide stability and ease of use.
4)Pardus should keep its base architecture like, Comar,Pisi,Kaptan,Yalı and good integration with other programs.

Best Regards,

Murat

of course independent.
It was 2 different topic

1) release numbers
2) repositories

Also is there a benefit of merging the repositories?

So that not to make double work.

@richdb

What about release numbers? I hate 2009,2011 etc.
It should be like version 1, 2 like that. Year is not really good choice.