I voted 'no' because I'm using 2011. I have nothing against KDE 3. It's just that I prefer KDE 4.
I still don't quite understand why they don't use the same base. That way, one could install the KDE 3 desktop on 2011 or KDE 4 on Corporate 2. They'd also only have to maintain one base and repo.
Is it because 2011 is semi-rolling? Is Corporate 2 meant to be a more stable, fixed release?
Welcome! I didn't realize this was your introduction until I saw the category it was in.